The Role of the Therapist in the Intervention Critical Thinking Paper Sample

Paper Instructions

Academic level – Undergraduate 3-4
Type of paper – Critical thinking
Topic Title – The Role of the Therapist in the Intervention
Instructions:

In some respects, Humanists are opposed to the idea of “intervention.”
Why is that?

How would Rogers define the therapist’s role in intervention? use peer-reviewed journal article from the last 7 years (please do not repeat citation)

Sample

Since intervention goes against the humanistic concept in the client’s self-determination, humanistic therapists may object to the idea. According to the selected peer-reviewed literature, humanistic therapists think that the client should make life decisions because they know what is best for them, rather than the therapist pushing their own opinions on the client. In a humanistic approach, the therapist’s job is to provide a secure and encouraging environment in which the client can explore his or her thoughts and feelings without fear of criticism or interference.

In his book “A Way of Being” (1980), Rogers provides a comprehensive definition of the concepts of unconditional positive regard and empathic understanding. According to him, the therapist’s role lies in accepting each patient as they are, without any constraints or preconceived notions. A psychologist works with people to comprehend their viewpoints and experiences. The therapist is successful in upholding an essential framework to guarantee support and safety with the method described. The possibility to develop self-awareness and self-cognition without worries, fears, or judgment is gained by the person.

According to Elliott et al. (2018), humanistic therapists believe in the client’s self-determination and resist the idea of intervention because it goes against this belief. Such therapists are confident that the client should make decisions about their lives, as they have a better understanding of what suits them, and therapists should not impose their own opinions on the client. Elliott et al.’s research emphasizes the significance of empathy in therapist-client relationships that build trust and guarantee smooth cooperation (2018, p. 399). Humanists’ point prioritizes client autonomy and the value of the therapeutic relationship.

Creating a secure and encouraging setting for the client to explore their thoughts and feelings is crucial, and this is something that both the humanistic and Rogerian approaches emphasize. In turn, humanistic therapists let the client take the initiative when it comes to intervention. According to Rogers, the therapist’s duty is to support the client’s exploration by exhibiting empathy and understanding. The choice of therapeutic strategy ultimately depends on the special requirements and preferences of the client.

References
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Murphy, D. (2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000175

Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin.