Table of contents
Before you start writing a review of an article, you should familiarize yourself with what it is in itself. In short, an article review is doing research on someone else’s article, where you compile and access the material.
You can also rate the topic of the article, which includes a preliminary reading of this article. This may be a critical review or a literature review. You can agree with the exact point of view of the author or, on the contrary, condemn it. In critical analysis, a particular article or book, as well as any work of art, is extensively considered. There are some types of article reviews:
A review of an article, like an assessment or a summary of someone’s work, has a specific writing format. To do this, there are certain recommendations that you can follow when writing a review. Writing a review of an article should include judgments, comparisons, generalizations, evaluation, and classification.
Note! In each of the reviews, add certain ideas, theories, and studies that relate to the area of the article. You should not include new information in your article of this type, but evaluate the quality of the work of another person.
Peer review of an article is essential when writing because readers are thus familiarized with unknown terms. When reviewing, you analyze the text, which works as a cumulative effect and helps to do better work next time.
Before you start writing a review of someone else’s article, you need to do some preparation to make at least a template. This preparation will include the following steps.
To inspire you to write your article review and learn how to choose the most interesting topic, then look at the work of other writers and check them through:
Article Review Topics & Ideas to Follow
10 Facts for an Article Review on Social Science and Crime Prevention
You need to understand what exactly an article review is. You need to be prepared for the fact that those people who will read your review are likely to be deeply familiar with the material and have enough knowledge on the topic. This is most likely a narrow audience.
First, you should look at the topic broadly, identifying all the main ideas of the reviewed material, the thoughts of the author, and other works on similar specifics. Your task is to criticize the matter and the effectiveness of the task area. In the review, you respond to the research of other authors with your point of view, but do not give new ideas. You make an assessment and sum up, taking into account the intended idea of the author of the original text.
It is also worthwhile to initially determine the organization of your review article. Even before you start writing, you should understand how you will begin and how you will end your article. It will also give you a picture of how to read other people’s articles to increase the effectiveness of the review. Summarize the material of the whole article and focus on the main information and points. Look at the positive points of view on the article and think about what the author of the text did really well.
But at the same time, do not relax and pay attention to problems and contradictions in the text. You also have the right to check whether enough research has been done by the author on the topic discussed in the text. See if there are any questions left that you haven’t answered.
Preview the article, its abstracts, and introduction. Also, analyze the headings for each paragraph of the work and evaluate the conclusion that the author made. The first few paragraphs can give a rough picture of what the author wants to say and understand what the article will be about. Such steps give a brief idea of what will be said in the article. You look more broadly at the subject of the article and the message that the author conveys. This in turn will give a hint of the purpose of the argument.
After you begin to understand what the article is about, you can take adequate notes, and the questions will be formed that will help the analysis. The most interesting part is identifying unfamiliar terms and words in order to read about their meaning and put them together in the overall puzzle of the article you are reviewing.
Try to provide yourself with a calm and quiet place to read your text carefully and make sure you don’t miss any of the main points the author is focusing on. Do a few readings and add notes to the main sections. Highlight what you think are the main points and what details are present. Then compare these notes with what you have read.
After you have read the article, try to rewrite it in your own words. When you have written out all the important points, then you are quite ready to write an article in your own words. Write all the main points accurately and logically – this way you make it easier to get any information from the article. Review them to determine which of these elements are really redundant.
Once you have completed all the previous steps and have the text written in your own words in front of you, then you are ready to draw up a review plan. You already have all the information about whether the author was right or not.
Write down all possible options for your plan (you can even make a supportive ppt). Also, identify those that need improvement. Write down the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s idea of the original text. Strengths can be, for example, a clear generalization of a specific issue. A weakness, on the contrary, is information that is of no value to readers. Also, one that contradicts the facts. Next, ask yourself questions that will help you analyze and critique the source text:
Without structure, it is hard to get oriented in the writing process. You can use the rough plan for writing an article review, which consists of:
Article reviews are commonly used in newspapers, scientific journals, and websites, so formatting rules must be adhered to in order for your work to be accepted by the editors.
Among the most used formats are APA and MLA for citation. The American Psychological Association’s Guide to Publications defined this format, which is currently in its seventh edition. And the MLA citation format is in the tenth edition, which can be found in the MLA Handbook (as defined by the Modern Language Association). In common, these two formats consist of:
But each of the quotes will look different, depending on the style in which you write your work. There will also be different rules about capitalization, author names, or where to place the date. There is also a difference in layout and formatting.
Basically, the MLA format is used as a means to document sources and format documents in scientific form. And APA is the style that is used when writing publications, books, articles, and magazines – for the social sciences. The APA format is divided into 4 main sections, which consist of:
Whereas MLA style does not have a separate title page. Therefore, the title is on the same page of text but is separated by a double space from it. This format has only 2 main sections:
When writing articles in this format, you add a heading to the first page on the left, where you write your name, the name of your teacher from the university or supervisor, your course, and the date of writing. The rest of the pages should have headings on the right side, which will contain your last name and the number of pages.
And when writing a review of an article in the APA style, you will add your name and the name of your educational institution or editorial office to the title page. All pages should have a heading at the top, as well as a title page, which will also show the number of pages and the title of your work.
If your assignment requires you to use the MLA format, where you will display citations in author-page format. You mention the author and page number after you write a quote. And in the APA format, you write citations in such a way that the name of the author is mentioned along with the year the work was published immediately in brackets after you write the citation.
In both indirect and direct citations, when you use the MLA format, you don’t need to include the year, but you do need to put a comma after the author’s name and “p.” in front of the page number, which will be mandatory for the APA format.
In the APA format, links are the original page where you list the sources that were referenced in the process of writing. The same in the case of the MLA format is called cited works. When you cite a document in MLA style, write the last name of the author first, and then his/her first name at the end. When you make work in the APA style, you write the author’s last name in full but abbreviate the first name to initials.
When using the MLA style, you underline the title and capitalize the first letters of all important words in the title. Whereas in APA style, you write the title in italics and capitalize the first letter of the title, proper names, and subtitle.
After you have gone through all the steps of preparing to write an article and familiarized yourself with the principles of formatting, then you are ready to begin the step-by-step process of writing an article review.
In addition to the general guidelines and rules, you can see what experts advise when writing an article review:
How to Write an Article Review in Leadership Studies
How to Write an Article Review in Ethics and Do It Right?
How to Write an Article Review in Nutrition
Think of a title for your article review. This title should hit the point of the review and display the main idea. You should choose between different heading types: descriptive, interrogative, declarative, whichever suits your review better.
Add a direct quote to your article. It will be under the heading and will be the complete link in proper form and order. Then proceed to the next line, which will already be the beginning of your article. Don’t forget the empty line between the quote and the first sentence.
After you have written the title and quote, you can proceed to the review. Put the name you have chosen, as well as the name of the author of the original text and the name of the publication. In the first paragraph, indicate the year of writing of the document you are reviewing.
You are now ready to start writing the introduction of your review, where you add an identifying sentence. The main topic of the article and its main aspect will also be presented here. You can also describe the thoughts and arguments of the author. Don’t forget about inclusion and his/her opinions.
It is a mistake to add multiple points of view to your thesis, making it vague. This problem also applies to the authors of the text that you describe. This may lead you to determine the thesis yourself and write it based on your own personal considerations.
Summarize the entire review you have done. This is just the time when you make the final summary of all the main details of the work and finalize all your thoughts. Show readers how your review supports the author’s assertions and conclusions. You can break the conclusion into paragraphs if the length allows it. Most likely the volume of this part will be specified in the task.
You will frame it as your opinion on the topic of how you think the text of the author of points is useful in terms of explaining the subject. Write about whether you agree with the author’s point of view or not. In the positive case, give reasons why you support him, and in the opposite case, give reasons why you condemn him. You can add information about which audience would get the benefit from reading this material.
Note! Include critiques in your work that are based on information obtained from the article’s research. You show your readers or the author has carefully considered this topic.
Show readers what you personally came to after writing a review of the article. Collect all the main points in a paragraph and describe your thoughts on the accuracy, clarity, and significance of the article. You can also add information about whether the value is related or not. Your conclusion will take up approximately 10% of the entire essay. Be sure to correct your work – post-writing. You should check your work for grammatical errors, as well as for illogical connections and similar unnecessary elements. To avoid excessive unnecessary information, focus on 3-4 critical questions.
In addition to general rules, do not bypass useful tips, which will make the process of writing a review not so laborious. Check out the following tips on this topic:
If even after reading the tips you still have doubts, or you have enough skills and time to prepare such a study paper, then just try to start, and in the process of preparation, determine where you have weaknesses and correct them.